Sam Harrelson nullius in verba

Why I’m Keeping My Personal Site

parthenon-and-the-acropolis-landmark-1

A web site is admittedly a nice thing to have if you’re a web-based professional. But if your business isn’t dependent upon it (which it would most likely be if you were a web site designer, for example), then that’s all it is: a nice-to-have, not a need-to-have. If you can let it go, maybe you should. You’ll save yourself time, money and possibly even face in the bargain.

via Why I’m Letting My Server Space Subscription Lapse.

I completely disagree with the main point of this post because of one simple reason… digital legacy.

Whether you’re an SEO expert or not, it’s very easy to make your personal web site attached to your name and discoverable in Google. Personally, I view it as a responsibility to organize the content I’m creating now (and previously) around a personal site like this one in order that my children or future generations may find something of value or at least know and better understand the provenance.

Keeping this content in a walled-garden type social network (Facebook) that will someday go bust or forget I existed is not much of a guarantee for me there.


5 Comments

Couldn’t agree more. Every time I think about letting danielmclark.com slide, I remind myself that it’s not supposed to be a high-earning, high-stress thing. It’s supposed to be a place for me to centralize what I’m doing and post about what pops into my head that might not fit anywhere else. It’s easy to think that something like Facebook could take over for me, but I don’t want to trust my stuff to a third party that may or may not be around in ten years. On my own domain, with my own site, I know *I’ve* got control.

Posted by Daniel M. Clark on 15 October 2009 @ 9am

You make a fantastic point, Sam! So many “A-listers” have let their blogs and personal site go dormant or lapse in favor of Twitter or Facebook. What happens when those do go bust? Or, when Google buys them and lets them go dormant?

I love social media and both Twitter and Facebook, but I’m not going to let my own sites go “dark” by focusing only on my “play-time” sites.

Posted by Tim Jones on 15 October 2009 @ 9am

Great points, gentlemen.

It’s the same reason I own a domain with my name, my wife’s name, my daughter’s name (her first name even!… how cool is that?) and any future kids we have. There is something to this idea of digital identity that we need to protect and make sure we steward.

I’ve even stripped out Disqus from my sites and gone back to using self-hosted commenting systems because I do value the content produced in this section of the site and want it to stick around as long as samharrelson.com does as well.

Sam

Posted by Sam Harrelson on 15 October 2009 @ 10am

I’ve been thinking a little bit about going back to basic Wordpress comments, but I like the Twitter/Facebook integration that advanced systems have… even if they’re not used much lol

Posted by Daniel M. Clark on 15 October 2009 @ 10am

And if you have other websites making money on a server, then there’s no reason to let your own name go away. I’ve had my kids names for years, but I am curious Sam, how do you know what kids you’re going to have in the future?

Posted by Jimmy Daniels on 16 October 2009 @ 5am

Leave a Comment

Bringing It All Back Home Literally Working on the iPhone